SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Derek N. Phillips

Last decided Dallas North OHOJul 2026
Decisions 4,381since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Derek N. Phillips has a 71% approval rate since 2016, his latest-period approval rate of 69% sits 5 points above the Dallas North OHO average of 64%. These figures are derived from a docket of 4,381 decisions, providing a stable view of past activity. These metrics reflect historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your claim.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 71%
Decisions on record 4,381
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Phillips Dallas North OHO National
Approval rate 69% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 61% — —
Denials 31% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Phillips's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Phillips
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Derek N. Phillips has shifted over the years since 2016. After a period of higher approval rates early in the record, the data shows a decline followed by a more recent stabilization. The latest period shows a 69% approval rate, which remains consistent with his recent performance levels. This pattern suggests that the judge's approach has reached a steady state in the most recent reporting window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Phillips's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dallas North OHO hearing office

Derek N. Phillips' most recent office on record is the Dallas North OHO, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the region and maintains a bench of 20 judges. The office-wide latest approval rate is 64%, reflecting the broader environment for disability claims in this location. You can see the Dallas North OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Dallas North OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Dallas North OHO, with 11 of them deciding cases in SSA's latest file. Approval rates among this bench range from 24% to 88% since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions