SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James E. Williams

Last decided RaleighJul 2026
Decisions 3,744since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. James E. Williams has an approval rate of 48% across 3,744 decisions on record since 2016, placing him within the 27% to 74% range observed among the 17 judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh. In the most recent reporting period, his 49% approval rate sits 12 points below the 61% office average, 16 points below the 65% state average, and 9 points below the 58% national average. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 3,744
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Williams Raleigh National
Approval rate 49% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 37% — —
Denials 51% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Williams's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Williams
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for James E. Williams has shown a varied trajectory across the 3,744 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of fluctuation, the data shows a rise in approvals between 2022 and 2024 before a recent shift. The latest period, which includes 391 decisions, reflects a 49% approval rate. This recent figure suggests a stabilization following the 2024 peak, and the current pattern remains a point of interest as you prepare for your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Williams's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

James E. Williams' most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%, you can expect a thorough evaluation of your evidence. You can see the Raleigh hearing office page for the full roster of judges.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office, and 10 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 74% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions