SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul Wood

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,402 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent periods to ensure an accurate picture of a judge's record. While Paul Wood holds a 38% lifetime approval rate, his most recent reporting period shows an approval rate of 41%. This latest figure sits 2 percentage points below the Little Rock office average of 43%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 3,402
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wood Little Rock National
Approval rate 41% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 34%
Denials 59%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wood's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wood
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Paul Wood spans 3,402 decisions since 2016, providing a stable view of his decision-making patterns. His yearly approval trend has fluctuated, with the most recent data reflecting a slight rise compared to his 2025 performance. This latest period indicates a continuation of his established pattern rather than a sharp departure. Understanding these trends helps you and your representative focus on the evidence most relevant to his typical review process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wood's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Little Rock hearing office

The Little Rock hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout Arkansas and the surrounding region. With a bench of 16 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 43%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Little Rock Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 66% over their respective lifetimes. You can expect a consistent administrative process regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions