SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Chris Yokus

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 2,833 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Chris Yokus has a 29% lifetime approval rate, recent data shows a 25% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 24 points below the Omaha office average of 49%. These statistics are based on 2,833 lifetime decisions, providing a stable data set for review. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 29%
Decisions on record 2,833
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Yokus Omaha National
Approval rate 25% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 16%
Denials 75%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Yokus's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Yokus
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Chris Yokus spans from 2017 to 2026, covering 2,833 total decisions. The approval rate showed a downward trend from 2017 through 2023 before stabilizing in recent years. While the latest-period approval rate of 25% is lower than the lifetime average, it reflects the judge's recent activity within the Omaha office. This pattern indicates a consistent approach to evidence evaluation over the last several years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Yokus's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Omaha hearing office

The Omaha hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout Nebraska and the surrounding region. It is staffed by 11 judges on record, with a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 49%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. See the Omaha Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, with lifetime records ranging from 29% to 83%. You can find the full roster on the Omaha hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions