SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jan E. Dutton

On record 4,520 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Jan E. Dutton reflect a history of decision-making at the Omaha hearing office. When comparing the judge's latest-period approval rate of 42% against the office-wide latest-period rate of 49%, you can see how this judge aligns with local trends. These figures are drawn from a docket of 4,520 lifetime decisions. These rates provide a historical perspective rather than a prediction for your specific hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 4,520
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Dutton Omaha National
Approval rate 42% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 37%
Denials 58%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Dutton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Dutton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Jan E. Dutton has shown fluctuations, with annual approval rates moving between 42% and 51%. The judge's record includes 4,520 lifetime decisions, demonstrating a steady volume of activity over the last decade. While the most recent period shows an approval rate of 42%, the historical trend indicates that the judge's approach remains consistent with long-term patterns. These variations often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Dutton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Omaha hearing office

The Omaha hearing office serves you if you are located throughout Nebraska and the surrounding region. This office maintains a bench of 11 judges on record, ensuring a steady flow of hearings for those seeking disability benefits. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 49%, you can expect a review process focused on your medical documentation and vocational evidence. You can view the Omaha Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Omaha hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Jan E. Dutton is essentially random. Across the 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 29% to 83%. With 6 judges currently reporting in the latest SSA data, you may be assigned to any member of this bench. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions