SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edward S. Zanaty

On record 303 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data sets, specifically your judge's lifetime approval rate against the office-wide lifetime range of 28% to 85%. With 303 lifetime decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of past trends at the Birmingham hearing office. These figures serve as a baseline for understanding the judicial environment. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 85%
Decisions on record 303

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Zanaty. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Zanaty's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Zanaty
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Edward S. Zanaty spans from 2016 to 2017, covering 303 lifetime decisions. During this period, your judge's approval rate shifted from 87% in 2016 to 75% in 2017. This trend reflects historical activity within the Birmingham office. Understanding these patterns helps you set expectations for the evidence required to support your claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Zanaty's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

The Birmingham hearing office serves you and other claimants across Alabama, operating within a region that manages a high volume of disability applications. With 23 judges on record since 2016, the office maintains a structured environment for processing hearings. You can expect a formal proceeding where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Birmingham Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 85% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions