SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sharon Allard

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Newark Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,240 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Allard?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Allard's lifetime approval rate of 55% is measured against the Newark Hearing Office latest rate of 57% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 17,240 lifetime decisions accumulated over a decade of service. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Allard Newark National
Approval rate 55% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 41%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Allard's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Allard
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Allard has maintained a consistent approach to disability adjudication. While the approval rate saw a peak of 63% in 2020, recent data shows a return to a 53% to 60% range in the most recent reporting periods. This trend suggests a stable decision-making pattern that aligns closely with the broader office environment. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern rather than a significant shift in judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Allard's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Allard? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Newark hearing office

The Newark Hearing Office serves a diverse population across New Jersey, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an active docket that reflects both regional economic factors and the complexity of local medical evidence. You can see the Newark Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Newark Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 40% to 65%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective strategy for any hearing. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions