SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Monica J. Anderson

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the New Orleans Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,080 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Anderson?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's lifetime performance against current office and national data helps provide context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Anderson has maintained a consistent presence on the bench over 10 years, with a lifetime approval rate of 47% based on 17,080 decisions. While her latest period shows a 52% approval rate, this remains lower than the 58% national average.

Metric Judge Anderson New Orleans National
Approval rate 47% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 38%
Denials 48%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Anderson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Anderson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 10-year career, Judge Anderson has navigated a significant volume of cases, showing a steady trend in her decision-making. Starting with a 39% approval rate in 2016, her annual approval figures have fluctuated but generally trended upward, reaching 52% in 2025. This latest period reflects a continuation of a more active approval pattern compared to her earlier years on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Anderson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Anderson? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New Orleans hearing office

The New Orleans Hearing Office serves a large population across Louisiana, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office operates under the broader SSA regional guidelines to process cases efficiently. The office's latest approval rate of 53% provides a baseline for local outcomes.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the New Orleans Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 36% to 70%. This variance highlights why focusing on your own medical documentation is vital regardless of the judge assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions