SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jim Fraiser

On record 4,332 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The New Orleans hearing office features a diverse bench with lifetime approval rates ranging from 38% to 85%. Jim Fraiser’s 39% lifetime approval rate sits within this range, reflecting a consistent approach to the evidence presented in his courtroom. His latest-period approval rate of 43% compares to the office-wide latest-period benchmark of 49%. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 39%
Decisions on record 4,332
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Fraiser New Orleans National
Approval rate 43% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 31%
Denials 57%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fraiser's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fraiser
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Jim Fraiser has maintained a steady decision pattern, with annual approval rates fluctuating between 34% and 43%. His record shows a consistent volume of cases, totaling 4,332 lifetime decisions that allow for a reliable analysis of his judicial activity. While his latest-period approval rate of 43% shows a slight variation from his lifetime average, the trend remains stable. This pattern suggests a judge who applies consistent standards to the evidence in each case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fraiser's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New Orleans hearing office

The New Orleans hearing office serves claimants throughout Louisiana, operating as a critical hub for regional disability adjudications. With 17 judges on record since 2016, the office maintains an active docket and an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 49%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the New Orleans Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The New Orleans hearing office currently uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 6 judges reporting activity in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across these peers vary significantly, highlighting the importance of being prepared for any outcome. The guidance for your case remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions