SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Renee S. Andrews-Turner

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nashville Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,391 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Andrews-Turner?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Renee S. Andrews-Turner is calculated based on 22,391 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, her 68% approval rate outperformed the Nashville office average of 60% and the national average of 58%. These comparisons highlight how her bench currently aligns with broader regional and federal trends.

Metric Judge Andrews-Turner Nashville National
Approval rate 67% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 32%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Andrews-Turner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Andrews-Turner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has shown periodic fluctuations while maintaining a consistent overall average. After starting with a 66% approval rate in 2016, the data reflects a pattern of variance, including a 74% peak in 2024. The most recent data from 2025 shows a 70% approval rate, indicating a stable approach to case evaluation over her career.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Andrews-Turner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Andrews-Turner? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nashville hearing office

The Nashville Hearing Office serves a significant volume of claimants across Tennessee, managing a diverse caseload with a team of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 60%, reflecting the regional complexity of disability claims. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Nashville Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 73%. Because of this variance, understanding the office-wide environment is as important as reviewing an individual judge's history.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions