Renee S. Andrews-Turner has a lifetime approval rate of 67% across 22,391 decisions, which is above the national average of 58%. While this rate is higher than the Nashville office average of 60%, these figures represent past trends rather than a prediction for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the evidentiary standards of this bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for Renee S. Andrews-Turner is calculated based on 22,391 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, her 68% approval rate outperformed the Nashville office average of 60% and the national average of 58%. These comparisons highlight how her bench currently aligns with broader regional and federal trends.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Andrews-Turner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a 10-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has shown periodic fluctuations while maintaining a consistent overall average. After starting with a 66% approval rate in 2016, the data reflects a pattern of variance, including a 74% peak in 2024. The most recent data from 2025 shows a 70% approval rate, indicating a stable approach to case evaluation over her career.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Andrews-Turner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Andrews-Turner? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Nashville hearing office
The Nashville Hearing Office serves a significant volume of claimants across Tennessee, managing a diverse caseload with a team of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 60%, reflecting the regional complexity of disability claims. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Nashville Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 73%. Because of this variance, understanding the office-wide environment is as important as reviewing an individual judge's history.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
