SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Angele Pietrangelo

Last decided NashvilleJul 2026
Decisions 4,041since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the 58% approval rate covers the entire record since 2016, the latest-period data provides a snapshot of recent activity. In the most recent reporting period, the judge approved 60% of cases, which is 3 percentage points higher than the Nashville office average of 57%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable statistical baseline.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 4,041
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pietrangelo Nashville National
Approval rate 60% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 40% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pietrangelo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pietrangelo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Angele Pietrangelo has shown variation across the 4,041 decisions on record since 2016. After starting at 49% in 2016, the rate experienced fluctuations before reaching 60% in the most recent fiscal year-to-date period. The latest-period approval rate of 60% remains consistent with the long-term average. This trend suggests a steady approach to case evaluation, with recent outcomes reflecting a continuation of established patterns.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pietrangelo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nashville hearing office

Angele Pietrangelo's most recent office on record is the Nashville hearing office, which serves claimants across Tennessee. This office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 57%, compared to the national average of 58%. You can expect a standard hearing process where your evidence quality and medical documentation remain the primary factors in your decision. You can visit the Nashville hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Nashville

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge assigned to your hearing is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Nashville office. Approval rates among these peers range from 47% to 75% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions