SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Martin

Last decided NashvilleJul 2026
Decisions 3,929since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Robert Martin is 47% based on 3,929 decisions on record since August 2016. This figure is at the lower end of the 47% to 75% range observed among the 11 judges whose most recent office on record is Nashville. In the most recent reporting period, your judge's 45% approval rate trailed the Nashville office average of 57% by 12 percentage points. These figures reflect historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 3,929
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Martin Nashville National
Approval rate 45% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Martin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Martin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Robert Martin has fluctuated since 2016. After an initial period, the rate shifted, eventually settling into a pattern where the latest-period approval rate of 45% remains consistent with recent yearly performance. This trend suggests a stable approach to case evaluation over the last several years. The recent data reflects a continuation of this established pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Martin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nashville hearing office

Robert Martin's most recent office on record is the Nashville hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 57%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. For more information, see the Nashville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Nashville

SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is Nashville, and their since-2016 approval rates range from 47% to 75%. In the latest SSA file, 4 of these judges recorded decisions at this office. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions