SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Moira Ausems

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Eugene Hearing Office · 7 years on the bench · 15,100 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Ausems?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Ausems demonstrates a high approval frequency compared to broader benchmarks. In the most recent reporting period, this judge's approval rate sat 17 points above the Eugene office average and 23 points above the national average of 58%. These statistics are derived from a docket of 15,100 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Ausems Eugene National
Approval rate 81% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 69%
Denials 19%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ausems's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ausems
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 7-year tenure, Judge Ausems has shown a consistent pattern of approvals. While the rate fluctuated between 74% and 81% during the first four years, the most recent data shows a rise, with approval rates reaching 96% in 2021 and 93% in 2022. This trend reflects the cases heard and evidence presented during those years. Understanding these patterns helps you prepare a case that addresses the requirements of this bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ausems's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Ausems? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Eugene hearing office

The Eugene Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Oregon, managing a diverse caseload. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 64%. You should be prepared for a formal administrative process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Eugene Hearing Office page for more information.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Eugene Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 44% to 81%. Because case assignment is outside of your control, the most effective strategy is to focus on the strength of your medical evidence.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions