SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bryce Baird

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Buffalo Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 14,644 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Baird has maintained a consistent record over a decade of service, with a lifetime approval rate of 52% based on 14,644 total decisions. In the most recent reporting period, the approval rate reached 62%, which is 1 percentage point below the current Buffalo office average and 6 points below the national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the judge's history.

Metric Judge Baird Buffalo National
Approval rate 52% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 51%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Baird's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Baird
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Baird has seen fluctuating approval patterns, ranging from a low of 38% in 2021 to a high of 62% in 2025. The data indicates a period of growth in approval rates following the 2021 dip, suggesting that recent case outcomes have trended upward. The current pattern shows a judge who has been more likely to grant benefits in recent years compared to the earlier part of their tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Baird's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Baird? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

The Buffalo Hearing Office serves a significant population across New York, managing a high volume of disability claims with a team of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 53%, reflecting the regional trends in disability adjudication. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical records and vocational history. You can visit the Buffalo Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Baird is essentially random. Within the Buffalo Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 46% to 56%. Because every judge operates with different preferences for testimony and medical documentation, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions