Stephen Cordovani is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Buffalo Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 47% over 20,374 decisions. This rate is lower than the national average of 58%. While these statistics provide context, they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing, as your evidence remains the most critical factor in your case. An attorney can help you prepare your evidence to meet the requirements of your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's history to broader trends helps you put your hearing in perspective. Judge Cordovani has served in the Buffalo Hearing Office for 10 years. While his lifetime approval rate is 47%, his most recent reporting period shows a rate of 51%, which remains below the current national average of 58%. These figures are based on a docket of 20,374 lifetime decisions.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Cordovani's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Cordovani has seen his annual approval rate shift from 40% in 2016 to 54% in 2024. This trend suggests a change in his decision-making pattern over the last decade. The latest reporting period shows a rate of 51%, indicating that his recent trend has remained relatively stable.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Cordovani's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Cordovani? See if a free benefits review fits your case.
Check My BenefitsAbout the Buffalo hearing office
The Buffalo Hearing Office serves a wide population across New York, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a consistent environment for processing cases. The office currently reports an approval rate of 53%, which provides context for the local hearing climate.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Buffalo Hearing Office, the 6 ALJs have lifetime approval rates ranging from 46% to 56%. Because every judge operates with their own unique style, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
