SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stephan Bell

Last decided BuffaloJul 2026
Decisions 3,424since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context on how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. Stephan Bell's 54% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, is measured against the Buffalo office's 52% rate, the New York state 63% rate, and the 58% national average for the same period. These figures rely on a docket of 328 decisions in the trailing 12-month window.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bell Buffalo National
Approval rate 54% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 49% — —
Denials 46% — —
Decisions 328 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 3,424

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Stephan Bell has issued 3,424 decisions. The yearly approval trend has fluctuated, with rates reaching 64% in 2024 and 2025 before shifting to 53% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. While the 12-month approval rate of 54% sits slightly above the office average, it remains consistent with the broader record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

The Buffalo hearing office is the most recent office on record for Stephan Bell as of July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 18 judges whose most recent record is at this location, with 5 judges active in the latest SSA file. The office recorded a 52% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Buffalo

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Buffalo hearing office, the 5 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 43% to 60% over the 12-month window. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 5 of them deciding cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Bell's 54%. All five last decided cases in New York.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Bell and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions