SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stephan Bell

On record 3,424 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both lifetime and recent data to understand their decision-making environment. Stephan Bell maintains a 55% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the broader 28% to 89% range observed across the Buffalo bench. Recent data shows his latest-period approval rate is 53%, aligning with the office-wide latest-period average.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 3,424
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bell Buffalo National
Approval rate 53% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 47%
Denials 47%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Stephan Bell has presided over 3,424 decisions. His yearly approval trend has shown variance, moving from 59% in 2016 to a low of 41% in 2022, before reaching 64% in 2024 and 2025. The most recent data from 2026 shows a rate of 53%, which reflects a return toward his long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

The Buffalo hearing office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 18 judges on record. The office currently reports a 53% approval rate for the latest period. Claimants appearing here can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 18 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in the latest period. Because approval rates vary significantly across this bench, understanding the local context is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions