SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Baker Jr.

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Baltimore Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,066 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Baker Jr.?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

In the most recent reporting period, Judge Baker maintained a 69% approval rate, which stands 1 point above the Baltimore office average and 9 points above the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 20,066 lifetime decisions, providing a reliable look at his judicial history. Comparing these rates to regional and national benchmarks helps you contextualize the environment of your upcoming hearing.

Metric Judge Baker Jr. Baltimore National
Approval rate 67% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 55%
Denials 31%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Baker Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Baker Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10-year tenure, Judge Baker has demonstrated a consistent approach to your disability claim. While his approval rate saw some fluctuation between 2017 and 2018, the trend has remained steady in recent years, with a 73% approval rate in 2024 and 70% in 2025. This suggests a stable decision-making process that aligns closely with his long-term average. The recent data indicates that his approach remains consistent with the broader trends of the Baltimore hearing office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Baker Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Baker Jr.? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Maryland, managing a high volume of cases. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 66%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the thorough review of your medical and vocational evidence. You can visit the Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your specific judge is assigned randomly. Within the Baltimore office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 46% to 81%. This variance highlights why you should focus on the strength of your medical evidence regardless of the judge assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions