SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary Forrest-Doyle

On record 3,734 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data periods. While Mary Forrest-Doyle holds an 80% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period approval rate of 79% sits 16 points above the Washington office's latest-period average of 63%. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,734 lifetime decisions, providing a stable basis for analysis. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 80%
Decisions on record 3,734
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Forrest-Doyle Washington National
Approval rate 79% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 71%
Denials 21%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Forrest-Doyle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Forrest-Doyle
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate for Mary Forrest-Doyle has shown a generally high and stable trend. After reaching a peak of 86% in 2019 and 2020, the rate has remained consistent, with the most recent data from 2026 showing an 82% approval rate. This steady pattern suggests a reliable approach to evaluating evidence over the years. The latest period reflects a continuation of this stable pattern, showing that her decision-making process remains consistent with her long-term record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Forrest-Doyle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington hearing office serves you throughout the District of Columbia region. With 19 judges on record, this office manages a diverse caseload and maintains a latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a professional environment where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in the outcome of your hearing. For more information, see the Washington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 19 judges on record at this office since 2016, 14 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates among these peers vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 85% over their respective lifetimes. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions