SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary Forrest-Doyle

Last decided WashingtonJul 2026
Decisions 3,734since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Mary Forrest-Doyle's 82% approval rate sits above the 63% office average, the 58% state average, and the 58% national average. These figures are based on 407 decisions. These rates reflect past activity rather than the likelihood of success for your specific claim.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Forrest-Doyle Washington National
Approval rate 82% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 70% — —
Denials 18% — —
Decisions 407 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 80%
Decisions on record 3,734

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Forrest-Doyle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Forrest-Doyle
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Mary Forrest-Doyle has issued 3,734 decisions. Her approval rate has fluctuated over this period, reaching 86% in 2019 and 2020 before adjusting to its current level. The most recent 12 months sit above the 80% approval rate recorded across her total decisions since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Forrest-Doyle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington hearing office is the most recent office on record for 33 judges, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. The office maintained a 63% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. You can find the full roster of judges on the Washington hearing office page.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Washington

The Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly. Approval rates vary across the bench, with the 14 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file ranging from 32% to 87% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 33 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 14 of whom decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Forrest-Doyle's 82%. Two of them last decided cases in District of Columbia. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Philadelphia region and other regions.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Forrest-Doyle and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions