SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stanley K. Chin

Last decided NHC BaltimoreSep 2025
Decisions 3,105since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data windows. While Stanley K. Chin has maintained a 56% approval rate since 2016, the bench at this office shows a wide range of outcomes, with individual judges recording rates between 40% and 90%. These figures are based on thousands of decisions, providing a stable baseline for understanding local trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 3,105

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Chin. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Chin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Chin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Stanley K. Chin shows variance over the years, starting with a 59% approval rate in 2016 and reaching a peak of 70% in 2017. Following a period of fluctuation, the most recent data from 2025 shows a 61% approval rate. With 3,105 total decisions on record, the judge's history demonstrates how case mix and evidentiary standards can influence annual outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Chin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Baltimore hearing office

Stanley K. Chin's most recent office on record is the NHC Baltimore, which serves the Maryland region. This office is part of a larger network of hearing locations where 16 judges have established records since 2016. You can expect a review process where the quality of medical documentation is paramount.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Baltimore

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and their approval rates vary significantly from 40% to 90%. This variation highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is the most reliable way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions