For law firms Join the ClaimsBoost partner network
SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stanley K. Chin

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nhc Baltimore Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,261 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. While the national average approval rate stands at 58%, Judge Chin has maintained a 56% lifetime approval rate over a decade of service. These figures are derived from 20,261 lifetime decisions, offering a statistically significant look at past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Chin Nhc Baltimore National
Approval rate 56% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 52%
Denials 39%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Chin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Chin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Chin has seen fluctuations in approval rates, ranging from a high of 68% in 2017 to a low of 42% in 2024. The most recent reporting period shows a 61% approval rate, which is 7 percentage points higher than the current office average. These trends reflect the evolving nature of disability claims rather than a fixed judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Chin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Chin? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nhc Baltimore hearing office

The NHC Baltimore Hearing Office serves you throughout Maryland and the surrounding region. It is a busy office with 6 judges managing a high volume of SSDI cases. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 49%, which provides a baseline for the local legal environment. You can see the NHC Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the NHC Baltimore Hearing Office, the bench consists of 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 46% to 81%. Because assignment is essentially random, you may be scheduled before any of these jurists. You can view the full roster on the hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions