SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Baker

Last decided JohnstownJul 2026
Decisions 13since 2026

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Robert Baker's approval rate to broader benchmarks provides context on how his decisions align with regional and national trends. Between October 1, 2025 and July 31, 2026, his 62% approval rate is measured against the Johnstown office's 54% and the national average of 58%. These figures are based on 13 decisions, providing a snapshot of recent activity.

Last 12 months October 1, 2025 – July 31, 2026 · record starts this fiscal year
Metric Judge Baker Johnstown National
Approval rate 62% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 54% — —
Denials 38% — —
Decisions 13 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2026
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 13

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Judge Baker made fewer than 100 decisions in the last 12 months, too few for a fair side-by-side, so the judge comparison tool leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Baker's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Baker
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Robert Baker has 13 decisions on record since 2026. During this period, the approval rate has remained at 62% through the fiscal year to date. This data reflects his activity since the start of the current SSA file window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Baker's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Johnstown hearing office

The Johnstown Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Robert Baker as of July 2026. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office maintained a 54% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical and vocational evidence of your claim.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Johnstown

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 3 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 50% to 62% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 3 of them having decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions