SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gary Ball

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,761 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to understand how a judge performs relative to their peers. While Gary Ball holds a 66% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period rate of 64% sits 4 points above the Baltimore office average of 60%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a stable statistical baseline. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 2,761
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ball Baltimore National
Approval rate 64% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 50%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ball's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ball
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Gary Ball has shown fluctuations, moving from 54% in the early part of the record to a peak of 78% in 2024 before settling at 64% in the most recent period. This trend reflects a dynamic approach to the 2,761 decisions on record. While the yearly approval percentages have varied, the judge maintains a consistent presence within the Baltimore office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ball's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore hearing office serves you throughout Maryland and the surrounding region. With 26 judges on record since 2016, this office manages a high volume of disability claims with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. See the Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the 26 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period, lifetime approval rates range from 32% to 79%. This variance highlights why understanding the specific bench is useful. Guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions