SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nelisbeth Ball

Last decided BaltimoreJul 2026
Decisions 2,087since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Nelisbeth Ball's 45% approval rate on record since 2018 reflects a volume of 2,087 decisions. Across the bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore, approval rates range from 32% to 79%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 2,087
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ball Baltimore National
Approval rate 62% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 51% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ball's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ball
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Nelisbeth Ball has shown movement since 2018. After starting at 34% in 2018, the rate fluctuated before reaching 62% in the latest reporting period. This latest-period performance sits 2 points above the Baltimore office average of 60%. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ball's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

Nelisbeth Ball's most recent office on record is Baltimore, with activity recorded through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 60%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore, and 8 of them decided cases in the latest SSA file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, ranging from 32% to 79%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions