H.J. Barkley III is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Tupelo Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 59% over 25,553 decisions. This sits slightly above the national average of 58%. While recent periods show a 66% approval rate, these figures represent past trends rather than predictions for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench and ensure your medical evidence is properly presented.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for H.J. Barkley III is calculated based on 25,553 lifetime decisions made over 10 years on the bench. In the most recent reporting period, the judge maintained a 66% approval rate, which compares to a 67% office average and a 58% national average. These statistics provide a broad view of historical trends within the Tupelo Hearing Office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barkley III's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a decade on the bench, the approval pattern for H.J. Barkley III has shown an upward trajectory in recent years. After hovering near 51% to 52% in 2018 and 2019, the rate climbed to 68% by 2025. This shift reflects a change in the volume of favorable outcomes compared to earlier years of the judge's tenure. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern of higher approval rates compared to the lifetime average.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barkley III's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Barkley III? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Tupelo hearing office
The Tupelo Hearing Office serves a wide region in Mississippi, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 67%, which is higher than the state average of 55%. You should be prepared for a formal administrative process focused on your medical documentation. You can visit the Tupelo Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Tupelo Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 19% to 64%. Because you cannot choose your judge, you should focus on the strength of your medical evidence. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
