SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Roger Lott

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Tupelo Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,122 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

To understand the context of your hearing, it is helpful to look at how your judge’s approval rates compare to broader benchmarks. His lifetime approval rate of 57% is derived from a docket of 22,122 lifetime decisions accumulated over a decade of service. While his latest approval rate of 64% shows recent variance, these numbers serve as a statistical observation rather than a prediction for your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Lott Tupelo National
Approval rate 57% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 58%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lott's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lott
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10 years on the bench, your judge has maintained a consistent approach to disability adjudication. His yearly approval trends show fluctuations, ranging from a low of 51% in 2021 to a recent high of 64% in 2025. This pattern suggests that while his decision-making remains steady, recent shifts may reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lott's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Lott? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tupelo hearing office

The Tupelo Hearing Office serves claimants across Mississippi and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases to ensure timely processing for those seeking benefits. The office-wide latest approval rate is 67%, providing a local benchmark for your claim.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Tupelo Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 19% to 64%. Regardless of which judge is assigned to your case, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain the same.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions