SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael DePrimo

Last decided TupeloSep 2025
Decisions 3,235since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Michael DePrimo is based on 3,235 decisions recorded since January 2017. When evaluating this figure, compare it against the broader bench at the Tupelo hearing office, where the 7 judges have recorded approval rates ranging from 19% to 66% over the same period. This range highlights the variance in decision patterns across the office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,235

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge DePrimo. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge DePrimo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge DePrimo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2017, the approval rate for Michael DePrimo has shown a varied trend. After an initial rate of 74% in 2017, the rate shifted to 55% in 2018, 54% in 2019, 60% in 2020, 57% in 2021, 60% in 2022, 66% in 2023, 68% in 2024, and 58% in 2025. These fluctuations often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented, rather than a fixed judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge DePrimo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tupelo hearing office

Michael DePrimo's most recent office on record is the Tupelo hearing office, which serves you and other claimants across Mississippi. This office is part of a regional network tasked with processing disability appeals. With a bench of 7 judges, the office handles a significant volume of cases, and you should expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical documentation.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tupelo

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tupelo hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 19% to 66% on their records since 2016. While these figures illustrate the diversity of the bench, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions