SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ben Barnett

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the San Antonio Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 21,522 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Barnett?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both their long-term history and their most recent activity. While Judge Barnett has a lifetime approval rate of 39%, his latest reporting period shows a 50% approval rate. This data is drawn from a substantial docket of 21,522 lifetime decisions, providing a stable view of his decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Barnett San Antonio National
Approval rate 39% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 34%
Denials 50%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barnett's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Barnett
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Barnett has seen his approval rates fluctuate, starting at 38% in 2016 and reaching 53% in 2025. This trend indicates a shift toward higher approval rates in recent years, diverging from his earlier patterns. The latest period reflects a continuation of this upward trend. These patterns help you understand the historical context of his courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barnett's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Barnett? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio Hearing Office serves a large population across Texas, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office maintains a latest approval rate of 52%, which provides a baseline for the region. You can expect a professional environment focused on evaluating medical and vocational evidence. You can see the San Antonio Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the San Antonio Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 39% to 51%. Because of this variance, knowing the tendencies of the office as a whole is helpful. You can find more information on the San Antonio hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions