SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Melinda W. Kirkpatrick

Last decided San AntonioJul 2026
Decisions 4,514since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Melinda W. Kirkpatrick has a 51% approval rate across all decisions since 2016, the most recent reporting period shows a 53% approval rate. This latest-period figure sits 1 point above the San Antonio office average of 52%. Because the volume of 4,514 decisions on record provides a stable data set, these figures offer a clear view of past trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 4,514
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kirkpatrick San Antonio National
Approval rate 53% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 41% — —
Denials 47% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kirkpatrick's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kirkpatrick
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Melinda W. Kirkpatrick has fluctuated since 2016. After a peak in 2017, the rate saw a decline through 2023, followed by a return to levels near the historical average in 2024 and 2025. The latest period, covering 472 decisions, shows a 53% approval rate, which aligns with the judge's long-term pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kirkpatrick's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves you and other claimants across Texas. With 23 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 52%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Antonio

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Antonio hearing office, and 17 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 70% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions