SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David R. Wurm

Last decided San AntonioJul 2026
Decisions 4,547since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing David R. Wurm's performance requires looking at both long-term records and recent trends. While your approval rate since 2016 is 50%, your latest-period rate stands at 52%. This latest figure aligns with the San Antonio office average of 52%, though it remains below the state rate of 56% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the local hearing environment.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 4,547
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wurm San Antonio National
Approval rate 52% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 38% — —
Denials 48% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wurm's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wurm
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, David R. Wurm has issued 4,547 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, moving from 54% in 2016 to a low of 43% in 2021 before trending to 52% in the most recent fiscal year-to-date data across 453 decisions. This recent activity suggests a steady pattern of adjudication that remains consistent with the broader office environment.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wurm's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

David R. Wurm's most recent office on record is the San Antonio hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you across the region and maintains a bench of 23 judges. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Antonio

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Antonio office, 17 of whom decided cases in the latest file. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 70% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions