SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeannie S. Bartlett

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Chattanooga Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 2,620 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Bartlett?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your claim, it is helpful to look at how a judge's history compares to broader benchmarks. Judge Bartlett’s lifetime approval rate of 46% is 12 percentage points lower than the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,620 lifetime decisions, providing a statistical baseline. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your individual hearing outcome.

Metric Judge Bartlett Chattanooga National
Approval rate 46% 70% 58%
Fully favorable 39%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bartlett's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bartlett
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 1 year on the bench, Judge Bartlett has maintained a consistent decision-making pattern. Her approval rate of 46% reflects a steady approach to the evidence presented in your disability claim. This consistency suggests that the judge applies a uniform standard across her docket, reflecting her established approach to evaluating medical and vocational evidence.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bartlett's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Bartlett? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chattanooga hearing office

The Chattanooga Hearing Office serves a wide population across Tennessee, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 70%. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical documentation of your impairment. You can visit the Chattanooga Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Chattanooga Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 40% to 75%. Because of this variance, understanding the local landscape is a standard part of your hearing preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions