SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lauren Logan Benedict

Last decided ChattanoogaJul 2026
Decisions 4,052since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 58% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a broad view of decision history, while latest-period data offers a snapshot of current trends. These figures are measured against the 4,052 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 4,052
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Benedict Chattanooga National
Approval rate 63% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 45% — —
Denials 37% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Benedict's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Benedict
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate has fluctuated since 2016, showing a period of decline followed by a recent upward trend. With 4,052 decisions on record, the data reflects a varied history of case outcomes. The latest period shows an approval rate of 63%, which sits 5 percentage points below the office-wide latest-period average of 68%. This recent activity suggests a shift in case outcomes compared to the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Benedict's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chattanooga hearing office

Lauren Logan Benedict's most recent office on record is the Chattanooga hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region and maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 68%. With 16 judges on the bench, you can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Chattanooga

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 7 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this bench range from 42% to 82% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions