SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Valerie A. Bawolek

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,004 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating your chances requires looking at the broader context of the Charleston WV hearing office. While your outcome depends on the specific medical evidence in your file, understanding the office-wide lifetime approval range of 39% to 78% provides a baseline for what to expect. With 4,004 lifetime decisions, the data for Valerie A. Bawolek offers a clear look at her historical decision-making. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your individual outcome.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 4,004

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Bawolek. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bawolek's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bawolek
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Valerie A. Bawolek has shown an upward trajectory, moving from 67% in the early years of the record to 90% in 2024. This trend reflects her approach to the 4,004 decisions on record. While the most recent data from 2025 shows an approval rate of 78%, the overall pattern remains one of high approval relative to the office bench. This long-term consistency helps provide a clearer picture of how evidence is weighed in her courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bawolek's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charleston WV hearing office

The Charleston WV hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. With 9 judges on record, the office functions as a critical hub for the SSA in West Virginia. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical documentation remains the primary factor in a favorable outcome. You can see the Charleston WV hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 39% to 78% on a lifetime basis. You can find more information on the office's performance on the Charleston WV hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions