SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. M. D. Crislip

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Charleston WV Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 26,375 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Crislip has presided over 26,375 lifetime decisions during a 10-year tenure. In the most recent reporting period, you would find the judge maintained a 70% approval rate, which stands 7 points above the Charleston WV office average and 8 points above the national average. This high volume of cases provides a robust data set for understanding historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Crislip Charleston WV National
Approval rate 66% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 67%
Denials 30%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Crislip's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Crislip
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Judge Crislip has shown meaningful fluctuations over the last decade. After a period of stability around 70% from 2017 to 2019, the rate saw a decline to 57% in 2021 before trending upward again to 70% in 2025. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence you provide in the hearing room.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Crislip's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Crislip? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charleston WV hearing office

The Charleston WV Hearing Office serves you and other claimants throughout West Virginia and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a significant volume of SSDI and SSI hearings. The office-wide latest approval rate is 59%, which provides a baseline for the local jurisdiction. You can visit the Charleston WV Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Across the Charleston WV office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 39% to 79%. While these variations exist, the core requirements for proving your disability remain consistent. You should focus on your specific medical evidence regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions