SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brent C. Bedwell

SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Milwaukee Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 23,750 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled?

Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to current office and national standards provides context for your upcoming hearing. While the national average approval rate currently sits at 58%, Judge Bedwell's recent performance shows an approval rate of 46%. This data is drawn from a significant docket of 23,750 lifetime decisions, offering a stable view of past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Bedwell Milwaukee National
Approval rate 47% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bedwell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bedwell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Bedwell has maintained a steady decision-making pattern. Yearly approval rates have fluctuated between 42% and 54%, reflecting the varied nature of disability claims. The most recent period shows a 46% approval rate, which aligns closely with the long-term lifetime average. This consistency suggests a predictable approach to evaluating medical evidence and vocational factors.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bedwell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Milwaukee hearing office

The Milwaukee Hearing Office serves residents across Wisconsin, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office handles a diverse caseload that requires careful navigation of federal regulations. The office currently reports an approval rate of 50%, which provides a baseline for local hearings. You can see the Milwaukee Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Milwaukee Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 27% to 52%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain the same for every judge. You can find more information on the Milwaukee Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions