SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brent C. Bedwell

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,071 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The data shows how Brent C. Bedwell compares to his peers at the Milwaukee hearing office. While his lifetime approval rate is 48%, his most recent reporting period shows a 54% approval rate, which sits 3 percentage points above the office-wide latest-period average of 51%. These figures are based on a substantial docket of 4,071 lifetime decisions, providing a stable view of his decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 4,071
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bedwell Milwaukee National
Approval rate 54% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 49%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bedwell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bedwell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Brent C. Bedwell has fluctuated. After a period of relative stability between 2020 and 2022, the trend has seen recent movement, culminating in a 54% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This recent figure represents a shift compared to his long-term average. The data suggests that while his baseline is established, recent case outcomes have trended upward.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bedwell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Milwaukee hearing office

The Milwaukee hearing office serves you throughout Wisconsin, operating as a key hub for regional disability adjudications. The office maintains a diverse bench of judges with varying approval patterns, reflecting the complex nature of the cases heard. You can expect a formal process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Milwaukee Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Milwaukee hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Brent C. Bedwell is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 7 judges currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, spanning from 27% to 56% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions