SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brent C. Bedwell

Last decided MilwaukeeJul 2026
Decisions 4,071since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Brent C. Bedwell are calculated from 4,071 decisions on record since 2016. When comparing these figures, look at consistent timeframes, such as his performance against the 27% to 56% range of his peers at the Milwaukee office. The latest reporting period shows a 54% approval rate, which can be measured against the office's latest-period rate of 51%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 4,071
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bedwell Milwaukee National
Approval rate 54% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 49% — —
Denials 46% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bedwell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bedwell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate for Brent C. Bedwell has shown a varied trend, moving from 49% in 2016 to 54% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. The data reflects fluctuations in annual outcomes, with a recent shift in the latest reporting period compared to the overall average. This pattern suggests that while he maintains a consistent presence, the latest period reflects a continuation of recent activity levels. These yearly changes may reflect shifts in case complexity or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bedwell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Milwaukee hearing office

The Milwaukee hearing office serves you across Wisconsin and is a hub for regional disability hearings. This office features a bench of 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 51%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Milwaukee

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Milwaukee office, and 7 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 27% to 56% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions