SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Margaret J. O'Grady

Last decided MilwaukeeJul 2026
Decisions 3,574since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Margaret J. O'Grady reflect a significant volume of cases. When compared to the broader bench at the Milwaukee hearing office, which shows a range of 27% to 56% in approval rates since 2016, these figures offer context for your upcoming hearing. The latest reporting period shows a 58% approval rate, which is 7 percentage points higher than the office-wide average of 51% for the same period.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,574
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge O'Grady Milwaukee National
Approval rate 58% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 47% — —
Denials 42% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge O'Grady's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge O'Grady
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Margaret J. O'Grady has issued 3,574 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with approval rates moving from 47% in 2016 to 59% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. While the rate dipped to 38% in 2019 and 39% in 2023, the most recent data indicates an increase in approvals compared to those years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge O'Grady's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Milwaukee hearing office

Margaret J. O'Grady's most recent office on record is the Milwaukee hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges who handle a diverse range of disability claims. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 51%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Milwaukee

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Milwaukee hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary, ranging from 27% to 56% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions