SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Timothy Belford

Last decided Lawrence MAJul 2026
Decisions 3,871since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 58%, his latest-period rate of 57% sits 4 percentage points below the Lawrence MA office's latest-period rate of 61%. These figures are derived from 3,871 decisions on record, providing a view of his decision-making patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 3,871
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Belford Lawrence MA National
Approval rate 57% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 41% — —
Denials 43% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Belford's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Belford
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has varied, moving from 54% in 2016 to 61% in 2025. The latest fiscal year-to-date data shows an approval rate of 57% over 430 decisions. This recent figure reflects a slight decline from the previous year, though it remains within the range observed throughout his time on record. The pattern suggests that while annual fluctuations occur, his approach to evidence remains consistent with his long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Belford's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lawrence MA hearing office

Timothy Belford's most recent office on record is the Lawrence MA hearing office, which serves the surrounding Massachusetts region. This office maintains a bench of 7 judges with a collective latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your outcome. You can see the Lawrence MA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lawrence MA

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Lawrence MA hearing office, there are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among this bench range from 41% to 73% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions