SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jonathan P. Baird

Last decided Lawrence MAJul 2026
Decisions 3,804since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Jonathan P. Baird are based on 3,804 decisions on record since 2016. When compared to the bench at the Lawrence MA hearing office, which ranges from 41% to 73% in approval rates, this data provides a clear view of historical trends. In the latest reporting period, the judge maintained a 73% approval rate, which is 12 percentage points higher than the office average of 61%. These figures reflect historical performance rather than a guarantee of your outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 73%
Decisions on record 3,804
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Baird Lawrence MA National
Approval rate 73% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 64% — —
Denials 27% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Baird's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Baird
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate has shown a varied trend, peaking at 80% in 2018 and 2019 before shifting in recent years. The rate reached 73% in the most recent fiscal year-to-date period. This pattern is based on 3,804 total decisions on record. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, indicating that the judge's approach remains consistent with recent performance.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Baird's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lawrence MA hearing office

The Lawrence MA hearing office serves claimants across the region. With 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 61%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lawrence MA

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lawrence MA hearing office, and 4 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 41% to 73%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions