SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ellen P. Bush

Last decided Lawrence MASep 2025
Decisions 3,005since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 46% approval rate for Ellen P. Bush reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 41% to 73% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Lawrence MA hearing office. With over 3,000 decisions, this data provides a stable view of past activity. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 3,005

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Bush. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bush's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bush
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Ellen P. Bush has fluctuated since 2016. After maintaining rates near 48% through 2020, the data shows a decline in 2021 and 2022, followed by a return to levels near 49% and 50% in 2023 and 2024. The 2025 figure of 47% reflects the most recent activity on record. These variations often stem from changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented, rather than a fixed judicial philosophy.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bush's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lawrence MA hearing office

Ellen P. Bush's most recent office on record is the Lawrence MA hearing office, which serves the Massachusetts region. This office is part of a broader network of hearing locations that handle a high volume of disability claims. With 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, you will encounter a variety of judicial perspectives. For more information on the local bench, see the Lawrence MA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lawrence MA

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lawrence MA hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 41% to 73% on their since-2016 records. While these rates differ, the process for presenting your medical evidence and testimony remains consistent. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions