SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alan B. Berkowitz

On record 3,992 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data periods. While Alan B. Berkowitz maintains a 67% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period rate of 71% aligns exactly with the current office average. This latest-period performance sits 9 points above the New York state average of 62% and 13 points above the national average of 58%. These figures rely on a robust docket of 3,992 lifetime decisions. These rates reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 3,992
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Berkowitz Long Island National
Approval rate 71% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 67%
Denials 29%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Berkowitz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Berkowitz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Alan B. Berkowitz spans from 2016 through 2026, covering 3,992 total decisions. His approval rate has shown a steady pattern over the last decade, fluctuating between 61% and 73% annually. The most recent reporting period shows a 71% approval rate, which is consistent with his historical performance. This latest period reflects a continuation of his steady decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Berkowitz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region. With 12 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality remains the primary driver of your case outcome. You can see the Long Island Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the latest period. Lifetime approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 48% to 83%. You can view the full roster of judges at the Long Island hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions