Curtis R. Boren's most recent SSA record (September 2022) is at the Atlanta North hearing office. Across 2,331 decisions on record since 2016, 53% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 24% to 94% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the full scope of their available data. Judge Boren's 53% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a baseline when compared to the 24% to 94% range seen among the 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta North. Because these figures are based on 2,331 decisions, they offer a look at past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Boren. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Boren's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Judge Boren has fluctuated over the years, beginning at 57% in 2016 and reaching 63% in 2017 before seeing a decline to 44% in 2019. In more recent years, the rate has shown a steady pattern, landing at 54% in 2022. With 2,331 total decisions on record since 2016, these shifts highlight how case mix and evidentiary standards can influence outcomes over time.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Boren's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Atlanta North hearing office
Curtis R. Boren's most recent SSA record (September 2022) is at the Atlanta North hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. If you are appearing at this office, you should be prepared for a review of your medical evidence. You can see the Atlanta North Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta North
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta North, with approval rates ranging from 24% to 94% on their since-2016 records. While the specific judge matters, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent. You should focus on the evidence in your own file regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Judge Boren's 53% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 24% to 94% range of the 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta North. Because case assignment is random, an attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific standards expected at this office.
Yes, the rate has fluctuated, starting at 57% in 2016 and moving through a low of 44% in 2019 before stabilizing at 54% in 2022. These trends are based on 2,331 decisions on record, and an attorney can help you understand how these patterns might relate to your specific medical evidence.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, so the judge you are assigned is essentially random. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing regardless of the judge assigned.
A hearing is a formal proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. An attorney can help you prepare for this process by ensuring your evidence is organized and your testimony is clear.
An approval rate is a probability cloud based on past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. Your outcome depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence, and an attorney can help you build a stronger case.




