SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Debra L. Boudreau

Last decided Colorado SpringsSep 2025
Decisions 3,182since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to their peers provides context on how different adjudicators approach the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) process. The 51% approval rate for Debra L. Boudreau is based on 3,182 decisions on record since 2016. When viewed alongside the 21% to 74% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office, it becomes clear that the specific judge assigned to your case can influence the outcome. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific hearing outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,182

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Boudreau. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Boudreau's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Boudreau
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Debra L. Boudreau has fluctuated over the years. Since 2016, the data indicates a varied pattern, with the most recent 2025 data showing a 68% approval rate over 209 decisions. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented. The latest period reflects a departure from the long-term average, suggesting a recent shift in the volume of favorable outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Boudreau's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Colorado Springs hearing office

Debra L. Boudreau's most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office, which serves you and other claimants across the region. This office is part of a larger network of locations that manage the high volume of disability appeals in the state. With 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, you can expect a review of your medical documentation and work history. You can see the Colorado Springs hearing office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Colorado Springs

The Social Security Administration (SSA) utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 21% to 74% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the broader bench is helpful for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions