SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kathryn D. Burgchardt

Last decided Colorado SpringsSep 2024
Decisions 3,047since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 46% approval rate for Kathryn D. Burgchardt is measured against the performance of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office. Across this bench, approval rates range from 21% to 74% for cases decided since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 3,047

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Burgchardt. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Burgchardt's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Burgchardt
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Kathryn D. Burgchardt has fluctuated over the years, showing a peak of 59% in 2018 followed by a period of lower activity, before reaching 53% in 2024. With 3,047 decisions on record since 2016, the data shows a varied trend rather than a single direction. The most recent figures suggest a return to higher approval levels compared to the 2022 low of 35%. These shifts may reflect changes in the types of cases heard or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Burgchardt's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Colorado Springs hearing office

Kathryn D. Burgchardt's most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office, which serves you across the region. This office is home to a bench of 10 judges with varying approval patterns. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical documentation and work history. You can see the Colorado Springs Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Colorado Springs

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 21% to 74%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, your preparation should be tailored to the specific requirements of the hearing process. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions