SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bryan Henry

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 3,487 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's record requires looking at consistent data points. Bryan Henry maintains a 42% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the 21% to 74% range observed across the Colorado Springs bench. In the most recent reporting period, he approved 48% of cases, which is 14 percentage points higher than the office-wide latest-period average of 34%. These figures are derived from thousands of hearings, providing a statistically significant view of his decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,487
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Henry Colorado Springs National
Approval rate 48% 34% 58%
Fully favorable 36%
Denials 52%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Henry's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Henry
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Bryan Henry has shown notable shifts since 2017. While the rate dipped to 33% in 2021 and 2022, it rebounded significantly in recent years, reaching 53% in 2024 and remaining near that level through 2026. This pattern suggests a recent period of higher approval frequency compared to his mid-tenure data. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady, elevated pattern compared to his earlier years on the record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Henry's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Colorado Springs hearing office

The Colorado Springs hearing office serves claimants across Colorado, operating as a key hub for regional disability adjudications. This office maintains a diverse bench of 10 judges on record, with a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 34%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. See the Colorado Springs Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, 4 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, spanning from 21% to 74% over their respective careers. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions