SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bryan Henry

Last decided Colorado SpringsJul 2026
Decisions 3,487since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 42% approval rate for Bryan Henry covers all decisions since 2017, while the latest-period figures provide a snapshot of recent activity. At the Colorado Springs hearing office, the bench shows a wide range of approval outcomes, from 21% to 74% on record. These figures are based on 3,487 decisions, providing a stable data set for your review.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,487
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Henry Colorado Springs National
Approval rate 48% 34% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 52% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Henry's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Henry
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Bryan Henry has shown notable shifts across the 3,487 decisions on record since 2017. Following a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2022, the data indicates a clear upward trend starting in 2023. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 48%, which sits above the office-wide latest-period rate of 34%. This recent pattern reflects a shift in outcomes compared to the period between 2017 and 2022.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Henry's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Colorado Springs hearing office

Bryan Henry's most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 10 judges. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 34%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical evidence you provide.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Colorado Springs

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Colorado Springs hearing office, and 4 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 74% on record.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions