SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert B. Bowling

Last decided LexingtonJul 2026
Decisions 2,858since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While you see a 37% approval rate on record since 2016, the most recent reporting period shows a 40% approval rate. This latest figure sits 10 percentage points below the Lexington office average of 50%, 11 points below the Kentucky state average of 51%, and 18 points below the national average of 58%. These figures provide context for recent activity, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 37%
Decisions on record 2,858
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bowling Lexington National
Approval rate 40% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 33% — —
Denials 60% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bowling's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bowling
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Robert B. Bowling has varied since 2016, ranging from 29% to 41% in annual data. With 2,858 decisions on record, the judge maintains a consistent volume of activity. The latest period shows a 40% approval rate, which aligns with the judge's historical average. This pattern reflects a steady approach to case evaluation, where recent data continues established trends.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bowling's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lexington hearing office

The Lexington hearing office serves you and other claimants across Kentucky and the surrounding region. As of the latest data, 18 judges have their most recent record at this location, which maintains an office-wide approval rate of 50% for the latest period. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. For more information on the local bench, see the Lexington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lexington

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lexington hearing office, 10 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench range from 21% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Preparation remains consistent regardless of your assigned judge.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions