SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Cynthia M. Bretthauer

Last decided EvanstonSep 2022
Decisions 1,852since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. The 50% approval rate on record since 2016 is evaluated against the 45% to 79% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Evanston hearing office. With 1,852 decisions on record, this data provides a look at past patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 1,852

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Bretthauer. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bretthauer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bretthauer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Cynthia M. Bretthauer has fluctuated across the 1,852 decisions on record since 2016. After starting at 57% in 2016, the rate saw a decline, reaching 46% in 2019 and 2020, 40% in 2021, and 55% in 2022. This trend shows that decision-making has shifted over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bretthauer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evanston hearing office

Cynthia M. Bretthauer's most recent SSA record (September 2022) is at the Evanston hearing office. This office includes a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Evanston hearing office, and their approval rates range from 45% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Because case assignment is outside of your control, understanding the office-wide bench is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions