James E. MacDonald's most recent office on record is the Evanston hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 4,097 decisions on record since 2016, 66% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 45% to 79% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
When reviewing approval rates, compare figures from the same time period. The 66% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 45% to 79% range observed among the bench at the Evanston hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, the 72% approval rate compares to an office rate of 61%, a state rate of 54%, and a national rate of 58%. These figures provide context for decision-making patterns, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge MacDonald's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for James E. MacDonald has shown a generally positive trend since 2016. After a period of stability between 2018 and 2019, the data shows a gradual increase in approvals, reaching 73% in 2024. The latest reporting period shows a 72% approval rate, which remains elevated compared to the long-term average. This recent performance reflects a continuation of the upward trend observed over the last several years.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge MacDonald's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Evanston hearing office
James E. MacDonald's most recent office on record is the Evanston hearing office, which serves claimants in Illinois. This office is part of a broader regional network, and its bench consists of 15 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 61%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Evanston hearing office, 6 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this group vary significantly, ranging from 45% to 79% on their records since 2016. Preparation remains the most effective way to manage your case regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Judge MacDonald's 66% approval rate on record since 2016 is situated within the 45% to 79% range of his peers at the Evanston hearing office. While this places him toward the higher end of the local bench, every case is unique. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific evidentiary standards required for a favorable outcome.
Yes, the approval rate has trended upward over time. While he maintained a 60% approval rate in 2018 and 2019, his performance has increased in recent years, reaching 72% in the most recent reporting period. Understanding these trends is part of building a strong case strategy with a qualified attorney.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency across hearing offices. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is essential to be prepared for any outcome with professional legal representation. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where an Administrative Law Judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be asked about your daily limitations, work history, and symptoms. Having an attorney can help you organize your evidence and prepare for the specific questions Judge MacDonald or any other judge may ask.
A judge's approval rate is a probability cloud based on past decisions, not a guarantee for your specific hearing. While the 66% rate on record since 2016 provides context, the quality of your medical evidence remains the most critical factor in your success. An attorney can help you ensure your case is fully developed before your hearing date.




