SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Charles L. Brower

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,137 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing Judge Brower's performance requires looking at both his long-term record and recent activity. His lifetime approval rate of 43% sits within the broader 18% to 70% range observed across the San Antonio bench. In the most recent reporting period, his 43% approval rate trailed the office average of 52% by 9 percentage points. These figures reflect historical trends rather than the outcome of your specific hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 4,137
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Brower San Antonio National
Approval rate 43% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 39%
Denials 57%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Brower's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Brower
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Brower has presided over 4,137 decisions. His approval trend shows fluctuation, with rates peaking in 2018 before shifting in subsequent years. More recently, the data shows a stabilization, with the approval rate holding at 43% during the latest reporting period. This recent trend reflects a consistent approach to the evidence presented in his courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Brower's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 23 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%. You should be prepared for a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in a favorable outcome. You can see the San Antonio hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is effectively random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the latest period, with lifetime approval rates spanning from 18% to 70%. Because of this variance, understanding the local bench is helpful for your representative. You can find more information on the San Antonio hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions