S. A. Bryant's most recent office on record is Washington, with decisions there through July 2026. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, 87% of S. A. Bryant's 400 decisions were approvals, against 63% at the office over the same window. The 14 judges here in SSA's latest file range from 32% to 87% over the same 12 months, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your specific case.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates provides context for how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. S. A. Bryant's 87% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, is measured against the Washington office's 63% rate, the state's 58% rate, and the national 58% rate over that same period. These figures are based on 400 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.
SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bryant's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since April 2023, S. A. Bryant has issued 1,082 decisions. The yearly approval rate has moved from 80% in 2023 to 85% in 2024, 83% in 2025, and 88% in 2026. The most recent 12 months sit above the 85% approval rate recorded since April 2023.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bryant's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Washington hearing office
The Washington hearing office serves the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. This office has a bench of 33 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 14 of them having decided cases in SSA's latest file as of July 31, 2026. The office recorded a 63% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Washington
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 33 judges whose most recent office on record is Washington, 14 decided cases in SSA's latest file and range from 32% to 87% in approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Judges with similar approval rates
These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Bryant's 87%. Two of them last decided cases in District of Columbia. With too few close matches there, the rest come from other regions.
- 83% Approval rate, last 12 months NaKeisha Blount
- 82% Approval rate, last 12 months Mary Forrest-Doyle
- 87% Approval rate, last 12 months Peter F. Gazda
- 87% Approval rate, last 12 months Michelle Thompson
- 86% Approval rate, last 12 months James S. Elkins
Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Bryant and the three closest side by side →
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
S. A. Bryant's 87% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, is at the top of the range for the 14 judges at the Washington office who decided cases in SSA's latest file. That range spans from 32% to 87% for the same period. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific bench you are assigned.
S. A. Bryant's approval rate has remained steady, with an 85% rate on 1,082 decisions since April 2023. Yearly performance has fluctuated between 80% and 88% during this period. An attorney can help you understand how these patterns might relate to your case.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because assignment is random, you should focus on preparing the strongest possible evidence for your hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where an administrative law judge reviews the evidence in your file. You will likely testify about your medical conditions and how they prevent you from working. An attorney can help you organize your medical records and prepare your testimony for the hearing.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. Every case is unique, and the evidence you present is the most important factor in a judge's decision. An attorney can help you evaluate your case and prepare for the hearing process.




