SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. S. A. Bryant

On record 1,082 decisions since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The data below compares S. A. Bryant's performance against broader benchmarks to provide context for your upcoming hearing. We look at the 85% lifetime approval rate alongside the 33% to 85% range observed across the Washington office's bench. Latest-period figures show S. A. Bryant approving cases at a rate 25 points higher than the office average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 85%
Decisions on record 1,082
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bryant Washington National
Approval rate 88% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 83%
Denials 12%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bryant's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bryant
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

S. A. Bryant has issued 1,082 decisions since 2023. The yearly trend shows a steady pattern of high approval rates, moving from 80% in 2023 to 88% in the most recent reporting period. This latest performance represents a slight increase over the lifetime average, suggesting a consistent approach to evaluating evidence. These trends help illustrate how S. A. Bryant has historically managed the caseload, though every case remains unique.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bryant's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington hearing office serves you throughout the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. The office features a diverse bench of 19 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 63%, the environment requires thorough preparation of your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Washington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 19 judges on record at this office since 2016, 14 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 85% on lifetime records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions