SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian Burgtorf

Last decided LansingJul 2026
Decisions 2,492since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Brian Burgtorf maintains a 42% approval rate across 2,492 decisions on record since December 2017. In the most recent reporting period, his 41% approval rate sits 12 percentage points below the 53% office average, 19 points below the 60% state average, and 17 points below the 58% national average. These figures provide a baseline for understanding historical decision-making patterns.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 2,492
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Burgtorf Lansing National
Approval rate 41% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 32% — —
Denials 59% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Burgtorf's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Burgtorf
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Brian Burgtorf has fluctuated since December 2017, moving from 53% in 2018 to 41% in the most recent reporting period. With 2,492 total decisions on record, the data shows a consistent volume of activity. This trend reflects the judge's historical approach to evidence and case requirements.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Burgtorf's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lansing hearing office

The most recent office on record for Brian Burgtorf is the Lansing hearing office, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves claimants across Michigan. With 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 53%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lansing

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lansing office, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 37% to 68% on their records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions