Steven L. Butler is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Dover Hearing Office. With a 62% lifetime approval rate over 19,154 lifetime decisions, the judge's record sits above the national average of 58%. While this data provides a helpful probability cloud, aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Butler maintains a lifetime approval rate of 62%, which stands 4 percentage points above the current national average of 58%. While his latest period approval rate of 63% aligns with the Dover office average, these figures are based on a significant docket of 19,154 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Butler's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a decade on the bench, Judge Butler has seen his approval rates shift, moving from 84% in 2016 to 50% in 2021 before trending to 63% in the most recent period. This trajectory indicates that recent outcomes are aligned with his long-term historical average, providing a baseline for understanding his current approach to evidence.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Butler's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Butler? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Dover hearing office
The Dover Hearing Office serves claimants throughout Delaware and the surrounding region. It is staffed by a team of judges who manage a high volume of disability claims annually. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 63%, the environment is focused on the evaluation of medical and vocational evidence.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the Dover Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 42% to 91%. This variance highlights why understanding the general environment of your hearing office is useful.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
