SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael Calabro

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Orlando Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 8,234 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Calabro?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Calabro maintains a lifetime approval rate of 63% based on 8,234 decisions. This performance is 1% higher than the Orlando office average, 4% higher than the Florida state average, and 5% higher than the national average. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Calabro Orlando National
Approval rate 63% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 37%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Calabro's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Calabro
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 4 years on the bench, Judge Calabro has shown a consistent trend in his approval patterns. His approval rate was 60% in 2016, 63% in 2017, and 66% in 2018. This trajectory reflects a stable approach to evaluating disability evidence and applying Social Security Administration guidelines throughout his tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Calabro's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Calabro? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orlando hearing office

The Orlando Hearing Office serves a significant population of claimants across central Florida. With a bench of 6 judges, this office manages a high volume of cases and maintains an office-wide approval rate of 62%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Orlando Hearing Office page for more information on the local roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses an automated system to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the Orlando office, the 6 administrative law judges have lifetime approval rates ranging from 57% to 63%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the evidence, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions